AFOOTMethod guideCurrent SF issue

Afoot method / public explanation

Timing research for teams that already own the relationships.

Restaurant project information is public but fragmented. Afoot turns it into a conservative review prompt without pretending that a filing proves a purchase, vendor search, or opening date.

01

Collect clues

Automated collection nominates commercial project events and related registrations for review.

02

Resolve the entity

Same-address history, duplicate checks, and transfer context separate active projects from administrative churn.

03

Write the limits

A human reviewer assigns a conservative stage, why-now explanation, product-line relevance, and explicit limitations.

Three product lenses

The account stays the same. The sales question changes.

Equipment + buildout

Buildout, refrigeration, cooking, ventilation, bar, warewashing, and installation timing.

Browse this lens
Tabletop + smallwares

Opening packages, serviceware, barware, prep tools, storage, and front-of-house setup.

Browse this lens
Jan-san + disposables

Chemicals, hygiene, paper, packaging, liners, and recurring operating supplies.

Browse this lens

Async evaluation

Review a real account before discussing a pilot.

The public sample is free and source-safe. A qualified evaluator can request a manually scoped four-week pilot by email, with no demo or meeting required.

Evidence limits

Not vendor intent. Not a contact list. Not an opening guarantee.

Afoot does not provide personal contacts, claim that an operator is changing suppliers, or assert that a project will open on a stated date. The value is the reviewed timing layer and the feedback that shows which signals became real sales actions.